Linus Pauling, the only winner of two solo Nobel Prize awards in history, had this to say about finding ideas: “The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.” This sounds idiotic to most ears because it cuts against the systematic, formulaic, efficiency-centric perspective worshiped in schools and professions. It seems wasteful to follow Pauling’s advice. Can’t we just skip to the good ideas? Optimize the process? Memorize a formula to plug stuff into? Well, you can’t.
The dirty little secret—the fact often denied—is that unlike the mythical epiphany, real creation is sloppy. Discovery is messy; exploration is dangerous. No one knows what she’s going to get when she’s being creative. Filmmakers, painters, inventors, and entrepreneurs describe their work as a search: they explore the unknown hoping to find new things worth bringing to the world. And just like with other kinds of explorers, their search for ideas demands risk: much of what’s found won’t be satisfactory. Therefore, creative work cannot fit neatly into plans, budgets, and schedules. Magellan, Lewis and Clark, and Captain Kirk were all sent on missions into the unknown with clear understanding that they might not return with anything, or even return at all.
The lives of well-known creative thinkers were filled with compulsions for playing with ideas: they wanted wide landscapes to explore. Beethoven obsessively documented every idea he had, madly scribbling them on tree trunks or on the manuscript paper he had jammed into his clothing, even interrupting meals and conversations to scratch them down.[118] Ted Hoff, the inventor of the first microprocessor (Intel 4004) used to tell his team that ideas were a dime a dozen, encouraging them not to obsess or fixate on any particular one until a wide range of ideas had been explored. Hemingway made dozens of rewrites and drafts, changing plots, characters, and themes before he published his novels. WD-40 is named because of the 40 attempts it took to get it right (Dr. Ehrlich’s cure for syphilis, called Salvarsan 606, was similarly named). Picasso used eight notebooks to explore the ideas for just one of his paintings (Guernica); if you watch the film The Mystery of Picasso, you can watch the master exploring ideas, good and bad, in real time as he creates dozens of paintings.[119]

In any field, creatives are those who dedicate themselves to generating, working, and playing with ideas. Pattie Maes, director of MIT Media Lab’s Fluid Interfaces group, explains:
There is further support for an innovator’s desire to seek out new ideas. In a recent survey, innovative people—from inventors to scientists, writers to programmers—were asked what techniques they used. Over 70% believed they got their best ideas by exploring areas they were not experts in.[120] The ideas found during these explorations often sparked new ways to think about the work in their own domain. And since they didn’t have as many preconceptions as the people in that field, they could find new uses for what were seen as old ideas. Doctors studied film production; writers read biographies of painters. Any pool of ideas, no matter how foreign, could become a new area of discovery for an open mind.

Creativity is intertwined with the ability to see ideas as fluid, free things. Ideas come, they go, and that’s OK; to an open mind, ideas are everywhere. It’s the willingness to explore, experiment, and play, to invest energy, hit a dead end, and then chase a new direction that allows minds to find good ideas. All of our notions of play, and its freedoms from formal judgment, are inexplicably linked to finding good ideas.
Idea killers
These are phrases for thoughtless idea rejection. They’re used by people who are too lazy to give useful criticism or direction, who fail to ask idea-provoking response questions, or who dismiss others not believed to have the potential for good ideas. Phrases like “it’s not in our budget” or “we don’t have time” are half-truths, as budgets and schedules can be changed for a sufficiently good idea. Others are idiotic, such as “we’ve never done that before,” a condition of any new idea, good or bad.
- We tried that already.
- We’ve never done that before.
- We don’t do it that way here.
- That never works.
- Not in our budget.
- Not an interesting problem.
- We don’t have time.
- Executives will never go for it.
- It’s out of scope.
- People won’t like it.
- It won’t make enough money.
- How stupid are you?
- You’re smarter with your mouth shut.
A complete list of idea killers is at http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/?p=492
[118] Edmund Morris, Beethoven: The Universal Composer (HarperCollins, 2005).
[119] The film The Mystery of Picasso (Dir. Henri-Georges Clouzot, Image Entertainment) is a classic of art schools everywhere. Few artists, much less legends, were as open to documenting their process as Picasso, as demonstrated by this film. Make sure to listen to the DVD commentaries, as they provide more insight than the sparse soundtrack. See http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0049531/.
[120] http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/?p=422.
In this new paperback edition of the classic bestseller, you'll be taken on a hilarious, fast-paced ride through the history of ideas. Author Scott Berkun will show you how to transcend the false stories that many business experts, scientists, and much of pop culture foolishly use to guide their thinking about how ideas change the world. With four new chapters on putting the ideas in the book to work, updated references and over 50 corrections and improvements, now is the time to get past the myths, and change the world.




Help






